RESTORATION NEEDS A GENTLE HAND
There are two cities that I love the most. Both are in Massachusetts in Essex County:
Newburyport and Gloucester/Cape Ann.
My family, husband, three kids and a dog and I moved to
Newburyport from Connecticut in the very early 70s. After
driving through this small city a few times we were blown away by the
architecture. Houses with interesting
rooflines and huge chimneys were everywhere.
Sure, they were shabby (today many of them would be called "tear-downs.) but it would have taken more than shabbiness not
to see that here was an enormous collection of the finest New England architecture.
Some were from the Georgian period but most impressive were the Federal
period houses whether three stories on High St. or modest Federals on side
streets leading down to the Merrimack River.
We drove up and down the streets feasting our eyes on this incredible
city.
Within a short time we made a giant decision to uproot our
family and live in Newburyport. We
arrived a few days before Thanksgiving in 1971.
At that time many other families were moving to Newburyport,
excited by the houses and the redevelopment that was just beginning. Newcomers were ecstatic when they uncovered
old paneling or found a hidden fireplace, some of walk-in size with bake ovens.
It happened all the time.
Newburyport was one big treasure hunt.
New homeowners celebrated the discovery of significant but long hidden features.
There was a lot of “do it yourself” restoration going on,
people helped each other and everyone was careful to do the job right. There
were no big dumpsters in sight. Families lived in the houses as they slowly
chipped away at the restoration. Features were saved, repaired, reused and when
necessary pieces and parts that were missing could be replaced at Whitey
Davis’s big salvage barn in Salisbury.
It was save, save, save and restore, restore, restore;
always replacing missing or unusable material with like material. Very gently, one house after another, was
coaxed back to life. Old wavy window
glass sparkled when it caught the light, old plaster was patched or skimmed and
had a slight
undulating appearance that looked just right without the stark
surface of sheetrock or blue board.
These houses were two hundred years old or more and perfection was in saving the fabric of the house and giving it a new lease on life. Perfect restorations did not mean perfection as in brand new, smooth, flawless in defiance of age of the house. These houses weren't disney-like reproductions. They were the real thing. The care and the research devoted to the rebirth of the city was exemplary and a model for other places waiting to be discovered and brought back to life.
Summer house tours were coordinated with Yankee Homecoming. Testiment to the interest in viewing these houses was the long lines of people waiting their turn to get across the thresholds for a glimpse of a saved house.
Now living in Gloucester I have been on a rant because of
demolition, threatened demolition and the callous gutting of houses by developers with
a heavy hand and houses chopped up to create condos even in a typical single family house.
It has been thirty or so years since I left Newburyport but
the reports along the way have been disturbing.
The thoughtful gentle work of the first generation of restorers is in
the distant past. Newburyport has been
discovered, the redevelopment of the 1970s is now a distant memory. The city looks gorgeous! Driving around and seeing the beautiful,
houses, fences and gardens everywhere is impressive. But I have been hearing that all is not well
in these houses after you cross the threshold. Walls have been removed, windows
with old glass thrown into huge dumpsters along with the other fabric original to
the house.
In the early days of Newburyport’s rebirth nobody cared
about fads and trends. Friends tell me I
would be shocked and that it is a good thing that I don’t live there anymore! Why? Because in order
to achieve the features in a house that the family of today feel they need or are entitled to, walls must be taken down. Kitchens need
to be huge so that they can accommodate huge refrigerators and commercial
quality stoves. And of course there must
be an island in the center made of granite, obviously. Walls must be taken down so that the housewife
can talk to her guests while she prepares for a dinner party. A “closed” kitchen is a thing of the past.
But the pendulum will swing the other way and housewifes will eventually realize they don't really want guests hanging over their shoulder while they cook, finding it distracting. Meanwhile the precious
original fabric of the house has gone to the dump.
A few days ago with a friend in tow I decided to make a
quick trip to Newburyport to see for myself.
I had only gotten as far as Ipswich when my attention was
arrested at the sight of a gutted house almost across the street from the Moses
Jewett house whose restoration I wrote about in this blog a year ago. One curved
attic window remains as a reminder of its Italianate beginnings. There is evidence of new wood. They are reducing the size of the large original
Victorian windows. Maybe they want to
conserve heat, maybe replacement windows don’t come in that size. Who knows?
It wasn’t a great house and it was not two hundred years old but it was
an honest house, needing work, but did it need to be reduced to a shell? Old time builders understood a lot about
proportion. What will the change in
window size do to a straightforward Italianate house? Time will tell!
We drove on into Newburyport and made our way up High
Street, always considered one of the most beautiful streets in New
England. In no time I was shocked to see
the former Van Bokkelen house at 249 High Street completely stripped of its old
clapboards and without windows. What was
missing inside I couldn’t tell. This was
one of the beautiful three story Federal houses. It needed work for sure but seeing it looking
like a shell even if it isn’t totally gutted was shocking.
This is an example of a fine three story High Street Federal. |
What also caught my attention was the work being done on one
of the chimneys. It appeared that it was
being rebuilt with cement blocks. Sure
they can parge it and from the street no one will know the difference but where
I come from this is not restoration. I remember the former owner relating the story of one of the
big snow storms in Newburyport. Maybe
it was around 1968. The owner built
fires in many of the fireplaces and the house cooled off but at a certain point
it leveled off and a tolerable temperature was maintained. I’m sure it was not 72 degrees but it kept
the house from freezing.
Stately High Street Federal with beautiful enclosed pilastered portico. It is not obvious what is left inside . |
Down on Merrimac St. along the river was the so-called 1690
House. It wasn’t really built in 1690
but was actually a mid 18th century house. (This date,1690, may have been
the date of the first silversmith in Newburyport.) It was previously next door
to the Towle Silver factory. When I
moved to Newburyport this house had been restored by Towle and then decorated
by some Newburyport ladies. Towle used
the lovely rooms to display some of their silver products. There was a parlor that inspired me. I think it had green velveteen tab
curtains. The stairhall with a beautiful Georgian staircase was papered with
a paper I loved called “Whipple House”.
It obviously got its name from the Whipple House in nearby Ipswich.
Towle is out of business, at least in Newburyport. The house
was sold and hardly recognizable. The
land behind it is filled with what appears to be new condos crowded together
and maybe the 1690 house is going to be part of that project. Whatever, the old house is no longer nicely
integrated with the now barren, treeless streetscape.
This Georgian house formerly owned by Towle Silver was one of my favorites but hardly recognizable. |
With just a few minutes left to spend in Newburyport we
drove up Strong Street so that I could admire one of my favorite houses, the
Georgian Atkins house at 9 Strong St.
Thankfully it is looking good with a new coat of paint. (Photo is not the best.) but as we approached the junction of Strong St. and Washington St. there we saw another gutted house at 41 Washington St. The windows were gone, and the entire interior appeared to be gone. This is a large gambrel roofed house of the 18th century dated at about 1750. The old maps indicate that even in the mid 19th century it was a double house having been divided right down the middle. More recently the entire house was owned by one family. The chimneys appear to be missing and may have been for some time.
Thankfully it is looking good with a new coat of paint. (Photo is not the best.) but as we approached the junction of Strong St. and Washington St. there we saw another gutted house at 41 Washington St. The windows were gone, and the entire interior appeared to be gone. This is a large gambrel roofed house of the 18th century dated at about 1750. The old maps indicate that even in the mid 19th century it was a double house having been divided right down the middle. More recently the entire house was owned by one family. The chimneys appear to be missing and may have been for some time.
This is a really large mid 18th century Georgian. Not sure what it had inside but it looks like whatever was there is gone now. |
I guess they want to save the pedestrians from the construction but how about saving the houses from the developers! |
We were out of time.
I had seen enough! I don’t know
any of the owners of these properties. I
don’t know their motivation. Maybe some
of this work is even justifiable.
Clearly, I don’t know what is going on inside these
buildings and I hope it’s not as bad as it looks. I don’t know what is necessary to save these houses and I hope those in charge know what to do to preserve these gems, not with a goal of making them brand new. It certainly does
not look like sensitive restoration/preservation to me. I hope I am wrong but I never saw a sight like this when I lived in Newburyport.
Last year a stately house in central Gloucester was gutted
much to my dismay. It has since been
turned into condos and they just went on the market.
Outwardly the house looks much as it did before, at least from the street side. The back has been added onto but the dignified old house was reduced to a shell.
Stately house with all of its pieces and parts intact, one year ago today. |
Outwardly the house looks much as it did before, at least from the street side. The back has been added onto but the dignified old house was reduced to a shell.
One year later. The exterior has been retained or reproduced because it was in the historic district but the interior was gutted. |
Reduced to a shell. |
The condos developed inside are
now ready for the market at prices ranging from $775,000 to $795,000. I’m sure
they are beautiful but the woodwork, staircase, chimneys and fireplaces if it
had them are gone.
Well intentioned people have been led astray, by the craze for replacement windows, the need for insulated walls,
steel doors, big open kitchens and commercial appliances and enormously decadent bathrooms. These are fads and
will pass as all fads do. In some cases it is the building codes that doom our historic properties.
In the meantime I can hardly bear to think about. the cost to the
integrity and well being of our historic houses. There is beauty in an honest house even when shabby. It is painful to read an ad for a house described as a tear down. Sometimes they really are but often they are houses with historical value.
Newburyport, Ipswich, Gloucester and every other town in New England has this legacy from the past that is being squandered. Before ripping out anything find someone in your neighborhood or community and ask for advice from qualified people or someday you may look back and think, “OMG. What did I do?”
Post Script
When I posted this story my computer immediately went crazy with the viewings piling up by unimaginable numbers.
Meanwhile, a Newburyport group, Newburyport Preservation Trust, posted my blog post on Facebook and the number of Facebook viewings also skyrocketed. At the end of 24 hours this blog had 1000 viewing and Facebook had racked up 3000 viewings! People responded nationwide. What is happening to so many old houses touched a nerve. The count on this blog has exceeded 1200 viewings at this point and still climbing.
The Newburyport Preservation Trust featured the story of what happened in their fall newsletter. Read the story here.
Newburyport, Ipswich, Gloucester and every other town in New England has this legacy from the past that is being squandered. Before ripping out anything find someone in your neighborhood or community and ask for advice from qualified people or someday you may look back and think, “OMG. What did I do?”
Post Script
When I posted this story my computer immediately went crazy with the viewings piling up by unimaginable numbers.
Meanwhile, a Newburyport group, Newburyport Preservation Trust, posted my blog post on Facebook and the number of Facebook viewings also skyrocketed. At the end of 24 hours this blog had 1000 viewing and Facebook had racked up 3000 viewings! People responded nationwide. What is happening to so many old houses touched a nerve. The count on this blog has exceeded 1200 viewings at this point and still climbing.
The Newburyport Preservation Trust featured the story of what happened in their fall newsletter. Read the story here.
http://www.nbptpreservationtrust.org/resources/Documents/NPTNewsletterFall2016ForWeb.pdf
This was followed by an editorial that appeared in all of the Essex County Newspapers condemning gutting and demolition of historic properties. It also introduced the new mandate passed in Portland, Oregon. In Portland if a house is going to be demolished and is 100 years old it must be carefully
DECONSTRUCTED. This means that it is torn down piece by piece and the salvaged material recycled as opposed to filling dumpsters with destroyed debris.
I hope that this attention to problem continues to be promoted not just here in New England but everywhere.
This was followed by an editorial that appeared in all of the Essex County Newspapers condemning gutting and demolition of historic properties. It also introduced the new mandate passed in Portland, Oregon. In Portland if a house is going to be demolished and is 100 years old it must be carefully
DECONSTRUCTED. This means that it is torn down piece by piece and the salvaged material recycled as opposed to filling dumpsters with destroyed debris.
I hope that this attention to problem continues to be promoted not just here in New England but everywhere.
Hello Prudence, I agree with you that people would rather have the Disneyland fantasy, even when that means tearing down what was valued originally. In a kind of weird doomed logic, many houses are gutted and rebuilt in order to modernize, but they say that at least they are respecting the exterior. Later, someone else decides it's o.k. to demolish the entire shell, because the interior is no longer original!
ReplyDelete--Jim
As alway, thank you for your comment. Great point. Save the exterior only to find the house in jeopardy because now the interior is gone. It is impaired and the incentive to save the shell is diminished.
DeleteWhen a house is chopped up into condos with multiple deeds and multiple owners the chance that it ever be returned to the original is gone. Like Humpty Dumpty, it is so fragmented the the chance of it being restored as a single house is gone. You can't put all the pieces together again!
Thank you, Prudence, for filling in the historical facts and the architectural details behind the feelings so many of us have when we witness the destruction of antique houses. You expressed my own opinions about certain houses we have lost in towns where I have lived- Newburyport and Gloucester. Why indeed, are these houses allowed to be taken from the community? I believe the answer is: the worship of private ownership, greed, and ignorance. Thank you for all the work you have done to educate us with your research and writing, and for your generous service on historical commissions.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Lois. You hit the nail on the head. I think the damage is mostly done by developers and not the typical homeowner. I know that you know these communities as well as I do and having lived in Newburyport more recently than I you probably have witnessed more destruction than I have even thought of or now about.
DeleteThanks for your comment.
Great post. I live in a 1786 home where we think twice before even applying paint, much less physical destruction. I am afraid that in the current political climate where "a house is a castle", "whats mine is mine and hands off", and "why should government/community/my neighbors tell me what to do inside my home", I don't feel enthused about the future. Looking on the bright side, it may make my home even more valuable once these Disneyland renovations start falling apart ;)
ReplyDeleteThe only way to change behavior is to socialize the respect for old homes through grass roots programs like "if this house could talk", and get the culture to change... see "http://walknewburyport.com for more info about what we did this past summer....
Hi Jack, Thank you for writing. People are very self serving and resistant to being told what to do but the response to my blog gives me every reason to be encouraged. A lot of people do care and we have to keep going and set an example. Being a preservationist can be discouraging but I like your "Walk Newburyport" idea and wonder if it would work in Gloucester, perhaps in the historic district.
DeleteThanks for your comment and if you are part of the Newburyport Preservation Trust let them know that I appreciate that my piece was posted on Facebook.
Yesterday I discovered the front page story in the Newburyport Preservation Trust fall newsletter referring to this blog. I want to thank whoever posted my blog on Facebook. I was shocked but encouraged by the huge response. People do care and we have to keep doing whatever we can to teach and encourage others to the importance of our mission and gain some momentum.
ReplyDeletePlease read the story in the newsletter at:
http://www.nbptpreservationtrust.org/resources/Documents/NPTNewsletterFall2016ForWeb.pdf
Again, my thanks to the person that posted the story and the person that wrote the great piece in the newsletter. I am thrilled!
Pru
When I posted the story the counter on my blog went crazy. I thought something was wrong and actually took it down for part of a day! When reposted the numbers started climbing again to about 1000 in the first 24 hours.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHi Prudence, I have been travelling to Newburyport on business for over twenty years. It’s one of my favorite places to go. I have no idea how I stumbled on your post but wanted you to know I enjoyed reading it.
ReplyDeleteThis selfish, unthinking behavior is happening everywhere. I worked with a man years ago in Newburyport doing restoration on a circa 1800 house on Boardman St. Other than getting electricity and plumbing, nothing in the house really changed over the centuries. Every room had a fireplace. Sliding interior window shutters in the "best room" were still in the house. A large trammel hook and crane could be seen when we opened up one of the fireplaces. Names and early dates were scratched into several window pains on the top floor. The house breathed its' history. Years later, someone bought it, almost gutted it, reconfigured walls, exposed brick chimneys, removed fireplaces, plopped in a granite kitchen island and track lighting,and sanded the floors (which we had carefully worked on, leaving 200 years of patina) down to bare wood. The simple front door frame and pediment were replaced with a grandiose one. It became a trophy house.
ReplyDeleteSaw similar happen to a house next to us in Cambridge, Mass., built in 1873. The previous owner spent years restoring it. New owners gutted it, removed fireplaces, threw out marble fireplace mantles, removed chimneys, ripped out a lovely curving staircase at the front entrance, and more. Then they sheathed the exterior in plastic siding, installed a high efficiency furnish with an exterior vent that screeches, and cut down a magnificent towering oak in the back to make room for a brick patio. (The replaced the lawn with brick, every inch of it.)The single family home became two condos that the owners rent out to spoiled rich college kids from abroad who have no sense of place, history, the neighborhood, neighbors, etc.